Citrix Systems Class Action
Verified October 22, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania (No. 2:24-cv-01130).
- March 14, 2024Case filed
What happened
This appears to be a proposed class action against Citrix Systems, Inc. The nature of suit is listed as personal injury/other, suggesting claims of harm to individuals, but the provided docket text does not describe the alleged conduct. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Citrix Systems Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed March 14, 2024 in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania (No. 2:24-cv-01130).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Citrix Systems Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Morgan L. Burkett (Neal & Harwell, PLC); Daniella Bhadare-Valente (Neal & Harwell, PLC); Charles J. LaDuca (Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP); Charles Barrett (Neal & Harwell, PLC). For Citrix Systems, Inc.: HYUN YOON (Holland & Knight LLP); Caitlin F Saladrigas (Holland & Knight LLP); ALLISON E. DELAURENTIS (Goodwin Procter LLP); Amy L. Drushal (Trenam Kemker Scharf Barkin Frye O'Neill & Mullis). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Alexander W Nunn
Defendants
- COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
- CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Morgan L. BurkettNeal & Harwell, PLCRepresents Alexander W Nunn(615) 244-1713
- Daniella Bhadare-ValenteNeal & Harwell, PLCRepresents Alexander W Nunn(615) 244-1713
- Charles J. LaDucaCuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLPRepresents Alexander W Nunn9 tracked cases(202) 789-3960
- Charles BarrettNeal & Harwell, PLCRepresents Alexander W Nunn5 tracked cases · $216.9M in disclosed settlements(615) 244-1713
- Brendan ThompsonCuneo Gilbert & LaDuca LLPRepresents Alexander W Nunn6 tracked cases(202) 789-3960
- Alexandra Coler WarrenCuneo Gilbert , LaDuca, LLPRepresents Alexander W Nunn2 tracked casesawarren@cuneolaw.com · (202) 789-3960
Counsel for defendants
- HYUN YOONHolland & Knight LLPRepresents COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC3 tracked casesEric.Yoon@hklaw.com · (215) 252-9537
- Caitlin F SaladrigasHolland & Knight LLPRepresents COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC8 tracked cases · $127.5M in disclosed settlements defended(561) 650-8349
- ALLISON E. DELAURENTISGoodwin Procter LLPRepresents CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.4 tracked cases · $117.5M in disclosed settlements defendedADeLaurentis@goodwinlaw.com · (445) 207-7813
- Amy L. DrushalTrenam Kemker Scharf Barkin Frye O'Neill & MullisRepresents CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.6 tracked cases · $117.5M in disclosed settlements defended(813) 223-7474
Other cases these firms appear in
- PVC Pipe Antitrust Class Action · Neal & Harwell, PLC
- LLT Management Antitrust Class Action · Neal & Harwell, PLC
- Tuna Direct Purchaser Antitrust Settlement · Neal & Harwell, PLC
- Tuna End Purchaser Settlement · Neal & Harwell, PLC
- HP Fraud Class Action · Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More other settlements
View all →Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detainment Settlement
From $685.87
Limetree Bay Refinery Incidents Settlement
Payments will be calculated using a pro rata point system encompassing property damage, nuisance, trespass, economic losses, cistern related physical impact, physical and emotional health manifestations, and non-reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses incurred that arose from the Limetree Bay Refinery release incidents.
SPS Technologies Fire Settlement
Up to $5,300
NCAA Concussion Settlement Medical Monitoring Program
Free medical screening and free medical evaluations up to two times