Findeisen Personal Injury Class Action
Last verified October 14, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, W.D. Texas (No. 5:24-cv-00717).
- June 27, 2024Case filed
What happened
This appears to be a proposed class action against Findeisen, apparently involving personal injury claims. The nature of suit is coded as 'P.I.: Other,' but no docket text is available to describe the specific allegations. The claims are allegations in a newly filed case and not proven facts.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Findeisen Personal Injury Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed June 27, 2024 in the District Court, W.D. Texas (No. 5:24-cv-00717).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Findeisen Personal Injury Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Mark Thomson (Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch); Jason L. Mays (Neiman Mays Floch & Almeida PLLC); Ricardo G. Cedillo (Davis, Cedillo & Mendoza); Andrew Clay Phillips (Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLP). For Findeisen: William R. Ogden (Farrar & Ball, LLP); Rachel Garza (Davis & Santos, PLLC); Jason Davis (Davis & Santos, P.C.); Caroline N. Small (Davis & Santos, P.C.). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Logan Paul
Defendants
- Coffee Break Productions LLC
- Stephen Findeisen
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Mark ThomsonMeier Watkins Phillips PuschRepresents Logan Paulmark.thomson@mwpp.com · (202) 978-1503
- Jason L. MaysNeiman Mays Floch & Almeida PLLCRepresents Logan Pauljmays@nmfalawfirm.com · (305) 434-4941
- Ricardo G. CedilloDavis, Cedillo & MendozaRepresents Logan Paulrcedillo@lawdcm.com · (210) 822-6666
- Andrew Clay PhillipsMeier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLPRepresents Logan Paulandy.phillips@mwpp.com · (847) 951-7093
- Shannon B. TimmannMeier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLPRepresents Logan Paulshannon.timmann@mwpp.com · (202) 318-3655
- Jeffrey A. NeimanNeiman Mays Floch & Almeida, PLLCRepresents Logan Pauljneiman@nmfalawfirm.com · (954) 462-1200
- Shelby O'BrienButler Snow LLPRepresents Logan Paulshelby.obrien@butlersnow.com · (512) 615-1225
Counsel for defendants
- William R. OgdenFarrar & Ball, LLPRepresents Stephen Findeisen, Coffee Break Productions LLC(713) 221-8300
- Rachel GarzaDavis & Santos, PLLCRepresents Stephen Findeisen, Coffee Break Productions LLCRgarza@dslawpc.com · (210) 853-5882
- Jason DavisDavis & Santos, P.C.Represents Stephen Findeisen, Coffee Break Productions LLCjdavis@dslawpc.com · (210) 853-5882
- Caroline N. SmallDavis & Santos, P.C.Represents Stephen Findeisen, Coffee Break Productions LLCcsmall@dslawpc.com · (210) 853-5882
- Kyle FarrarFarrar & Ball, LLPRepresents Stephen Findeisen, Coffee Break Productions LLC2 tracked caseskyle@fbtrial.com · (713) 221-8300
Other cases these firms appear in
- PetMed Express Consumer Class Action · Neiman Mays Floch & Almeida PLLC
- Tuna Direct Purchaser Antitrust Settlement · Neiman Mays Floch & Almeida PLLC
- Tuna End Purchaser Settlement · Neiman Mays Floch & Almeida PLLC
- Haley v. X.AI Corp. · Butler Snow LLP
- Resort Data Processing Contract Class Action · Butler Snow LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
In the news
- In new lawsuit, Logan Paul argues that Coffeezilla defamed him with CryptoZoo criticismTubefilter · July 8, 2024
- Logan Paul Initiates Legal Action Against Coffeezilla, But Why?Techreport.com · June 29, 2024
- Logan Paul’s Doomed CryptoZoo Project Resurrected by DAOMakerBiztoc.com · March 10, 2023
- Logan Paul backflips on defamation lawsuit against Coffeezilla, apologizesBiztoc.com · January 9, 2023
Headlines via NewsAPI.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More other settlements
View all →Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detainment Settlement
From $685.87
Limetree Bay Refinery Incidents Settlement
Payments will be calculated using a pro rata point system encompassing property damage, nuisance, trespass, economic losses, cistern related physical impact, physical and emotional health manifestations, and non-reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses incurred that arose from the Limetree Bay Refinery release incidents.
SPS Technologies Fire Settlement
Up to $5,300
NCAA Concussion Settlement Medical Monitoring Program
Free medical screening and free medical evaluations up to two times