Gordon v. DraftKings Class Action
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
What happened
A proposed class action has been filed against DraftKings, Inc. and Gus III, LLC in federal court in Massachusetts. The docket entries do not disclose the specific allegations, but the case appears to involve claims that could affect ordinary users or participants of the defendants' services.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Gordon v. DraftKings Class Action case?
- No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
- Where is the Gordon v. DraftKings Class Action case being heard?
- The case is before the District Court, D. Massachusetts, case number 1:26-cv-13525. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.
In the news
- DraftKings settles class-action lawsuit over NFT marketplace for $10MCointelegraph · March 3, 2025
- DraftKings Loses Motion To Dismiss Class Action Consumer LawsuitForbes · August 23, 2024
- U.S. Judge Sets Stage for NFT Securities Trial as DraftKings Lawsuit Moves ForwardCoinDesk · July 3, 2024
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Bradberry v. Equifax Information Services LLC - Duplicate Collection Accounts Settlement
Equifax allegedly reported the same collection account more than once on consumer credit reports, which the lawsuit claims violates the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Equifax denies wrongdoing, and the parties agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Patton v Trinity Settlement
Trinity Operating (USG) LLC allegedly failed to pay statutory interest on late payments to oil and gas producers for production proceeds from Oklahoma wells, in violation of Oklahoma law. The defendant denies all wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the costs of continued litigation.
Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.