Gordon v. DraftKings Class Action
Last verified August 4, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, D. Massachusetts (No. 1:26-cv-13525).
- August 3, 2026Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action has been filed against DraftKings, Inc. and Gus III, LLC in federal court in Massachusetts. The docket entries do not disclose the specific allegations, but the case appears to involve claims that could affect ordinary users or participants of the defendants' services.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Gordon v. DraftKings Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed August 3, 2026 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts (No. 1:26-cv-13525).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Gordon v. DraftKings Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Scott Harris (Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Johnny Harris
- Arie Weissmann
- Jason Gordon
Defendants
- Gus III, LLC
- DraftKings, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Scott HarrisBryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLCRepresents Jason Gordon, Arie Weissmann, Johnny Harris22 tracked cases · $34M in disclosed settlementssharris@brysonpllc.com · (919) 600-5000
Other cases these firms appear in
- Unison Home Equity Agreement Class Action · Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
- Rioux v. IDscan.net Data Breach Class Action · Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
- Sharecare Contract Class Action · Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
- McCormick v. The Campbell's Company · Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
In the news
Headlines via NewsAPI.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Each eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.