Powerhouse Retail Services Class Action
Last verified October 19, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 5:24-cv-02170).
- April 11, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action was filed by plaintiff Ramirez against Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC. The docket lists the nature of suit as 'Other Statutory Actions,' but the available text does not specify the underlying allegations. The lawsuit appears to seek class-wide relief based on alleged statutory violations, though the exact claims are not yet clear.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Powerhouse Retail Services Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed April 11, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 5:24-cv-02170).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Powerhouse Retail Services Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Ben Travis (Ben Travis Law, APC); Joshua B. Swigart (Swigart Law Group, APC). For Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC: Nicholas M Siamas , I (Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP); Joshua D Bradus (Gordon Rees); Jennifer Warner Torrez (McDonald Hopkins); Craig J. Mariam (Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- David Ramirez
Defendants
- Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Ben TravisBen Travis Law, APCRepresents David Ramirez15 tracked cases · $610,000 in disclosed settlementsben@bentravislaw.com · (619) 353-7966
- Joshua B. SwigartSwigart Law Group, APCRepresents David Ramirez24 tracked casesjosh@swigartlawgroup.com · (866) 219-3343
Counsel for defendants
- Nicholas M Siamas , IGordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLPRepresents Powerhouse Retail Services, LLCnsiamas@grsm.com · (925) 989-3625
- Joshua D BradusGordon ReesRepresents Powerhouse Retail Services, LLCjbradus@grsm.com · (619) 230-7706
- Jennifer Warner TorrezMcDonald HopkinsRepresents Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC7 tracked casesjtorrez@mcdonaldhopkins.com · (312) 281-0111
- Craig J. MariamGordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLPRepresents Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC2 tracked casescmariam@grsm.com · (415) 986-5900
- Anthony David PhillipsFox Rothschild LLPRepresents Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC4 tracked cases · $824,000 in disclosed settlements defendedadphillips@foxrothschild.com · (415) 364-5540
- Timothy J. LoweMcDonald HopkinsRepresents Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC8 tracked casestlowe@mcdonaldhopkins.com · (248) 646-5070
- Brian Andrew PainoHinshaw & Culbertson, LLPRepresents Powerhouse Retail Services, LLCbpaino@hinshawlaw.com · (213) 680-2800
Other cases these firms appear in
- McGowan v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company · Ben Travis Law, APC
- Edquid v. Headlight Health Data Breach Class Action · Ben Travis Law, APC
- Blue Shield of California Life & Health Insurance Class Action · Ben Travis Law, APC
- Piotroski v. Dr Pepper/Seven Up Data Breach or Consumer Fraud Class Action · Ben Travis Law, APC
- Unilever Consumer Class Action · Swigart Law Group, APC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More other settlements
View all →Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detainment Settlement
From $685.87
Limetree Bay Refinery Incidents Settlement
Payments will be calculated using a pro rata point system encompassing property damage, nuisance, trespass, economic losses, cistern related physical impact, physical and emotional health manifestations, and non-reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses incurred that arose from the Limetree Bay Refinery release incidents.
SPS Technologies Fire Settlement
Up to $5,300
NCAA Concussion Settlement Medical Monitoring Program
Free medical screening and free medical evaluations up to two times