Can I file a claim in the Switzer v. Project 7, Inc. case?

No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed September 11, 2026 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 4:26-cv-10282).

Who are the attorneys in the Switzer v. Project 7, Inc.?

For the plaintiffs: Katherine S. Phillips (Shamis & Gentile, P.A.); Scott Adam Edelsberg (Edelsberg Law, PA). From the public court docket.

In litigation — no settlement yetother

Switzer v. Project 7, Inc.

Verified September 18, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.

Where this case stands

In litigation

The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.

Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 4:26-cv-10282).

September 11, 2026
Case filed

What happened

A proposed class action filed against Project 7, Inc. alleging fraud. The nature of suit code (370 Other Fraud) indicates this is a fraud-based complaint, though the specific details of the alleged fraudulent conduct are not available from the docket entry provided. Ordinary consumers could plausibly be class members depending on the nature of the fraud alleged in the complaint.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the Switzer v. Project 7, Inc. case?: No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed September 11, 2026 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 4:26-cv-10282).What a class action lawsuit is →
Who are the attorneys in the Switzer v. Project 7, Inc.?: For the plaintiffs: Katherine S. Phillips (Shamis & Gentile, P.A.); Scott Adam Edelsberg (Edelsberg Law, PA). From the public court docket.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

Katie Switzer

Defendants

Project 7, Inc.

Counsel for plaintiffs

Katherine S. Phillips Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
Represents Katie Switzer
5 tracked cases
kphillips@shamisgentile.com · (305) 479-2299
Scott Adam Edelsberg Edelsberg Law, PA
Represents Katie Switzer
59 tracked cases · $21.6M in disclosed settlements
scott@edelsberglaw.com · (305) 975-3320

Other cases these firms appear in

JM Bullion Consumer Contract Class Action · Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
JM Bullion Contract Class Action · Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
JM Bullion Data Breach Class Action · Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
ZIZZL Contract Class Action · Shamis & Gentile, P.A.
Jacksons Food Company Class Action · Edelsberg Law PA

From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.

Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership works Your options as a class member

Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.

More other settlements

View all →

November 3, 2026other

Limetree Bay Refinery Incidents Settlement

Payments will be calculated using a pro rata point system encompassing property damage, nuisance, trespass, economic losses, cistern related physical impact, physical and emotional health manifestations, and non-reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses incurred that arose from the Limetree Bay Refinery release incidents.

December 3, 2026other