Tanya Arnold v. Rocket Companies (Quicken Loans) Class Action
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 5:25-cv-01887).
- July 23, 2025Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action has been filed against Rocket Companies, Inc. (which operates Quicken Loans and related mortgage lending services) in the Central District of California. While the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, the case appears to involve consumer claims under federal statutory law, potentially relating to mortgage lending practices, loan origination, or related consumer finance matters.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Tanya Arnold v. Rocket Companies (Quicken Loans) Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed July 23, 2025 in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 5:25-cv-01887).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Tanya Arnold v. Rocket Companies (Quicken Loans) Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Ross Cornell (Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC); Reuben D Nathan (Nathan and Associates APC). For Rocket Companies, Inc.: William Kyle Tayman (Goodwin Proctor); W. Kyle Tayman (Goodwin Procter LLP); Rebecca L Tarneja (Goodwin Procter LLP); Katherine G McKenney (Goodwin Procter LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Tanya Arnold
Defendants
- Rocket Mortgage, LLC
- Rocket Limited Partnership
- Rocket Companies Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Ross CornellLaw Offices of Ross Cornell APCRepresents Tanya Arnold31 tracked casesrc@rosscornelllaw.com · (562) 612-1708
- Reuben D NathanNathan and Associates APCRepresents Tanya Arnold46 tracked casesrnathan@nathanlawpractice.com · (949) 270-2798
Counsel for defendants
- William Kyle TaymanGoodwin ProctorRepresents Rocket Companies Inc., Rocket Mortgage, LLC2 tracked casesKTayman@goodwinlaw.com · (202) 346-4000
- W. Kyle TaymanGoodwin Procter LLPRepresents Rocket Companies Inc., Rocket Limited Partnership, Rocket Mortgage, LLC4 tracked casesKTayman@goodwinlaw.com · (202) 346-4000
- Rebecca L TarnejaGoodwin Procter LLPRepresents Rocket Companies Inc., Rocket Limited Partnership, Rocket Mortgage, LLC13 tracked casesrtarneja@goodwinlaw.com · (213) 426-2500
- Katherine G McKenneyGoodwin Procter LLPRepresents Rocket Companies Inc., Rocket Limited Partnership, Rocket Mortgage, LLC7 tracked cases · $135M in disclosed settlements defendedkmckenney@goodwinlaw.com · (617) 570-1000
Other cases these firms appear in
- Dawkins v. Midfirst Bank · Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC
- Erakat v. GoodRx Data Breach or Consumer Class Action · Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC
- Preferred Bank Consumer Class Action · Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC
- Dawkins v. East West Bank · Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC
- Iowa Health System ERISA Employee Benefits Class Action · Goodwin Proctor
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)