On Q Financial Contract Class Action
Last verified October 18, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, D. Arizona (No. 2:24-cv-01006).
- May 2, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against On Q Financial LLC, apparently concerning contract-related claims. The docket indicates the case was consolidated with two similar cases, Feathers v. On Q Financial and Eitemiller v. On Q Financial. Specific allegations beyond breach of contract or other contract-based claims are not detailed in the provided docket text.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the On Q Financial Contract Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed May 2, 2024 in the District Court, D. Arizona (No. 2:24-cv-01006).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the On Q Financial Contract Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Ronald Podolny (Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group - Tampa, FL); John A Yanchunis (Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group - Tampa, FL); John G Emerson (Emerson Firm PLLC); Elaine Ryan (Auer Ryan PLLC). For On Q Financial LLC: Younjin Lee (Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLP - Los Angeles); Xuan Zhou (Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLP - Escondido CA); Brian Jay Schulman (Weiss Brown PLLC); Allen Sattler (Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLP - Laguna Hills, CA). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Ryant Connelly
Defendants
- On Q Financial LLC
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Ronald PodolnyMorgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group - Tampa, FLRepresents Ryant Connellyronald.podolny@forthepeople.com · (416) 274-7144
- John A YanchunisMorgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group - Tampa, FLRepresents Ryant Connelly2 tracked casesjyanchunis@forthepeople.com · (813) 275-5272
- John G EmersonEmerson Firm PLLCRepresents Ryant Connelly12 tracked cases · $65.6M in disclosed settlementsjemerson@emersonfirm.com · (800) 551-8649
- Elaine RyanAuer Ryan PLLCRepresents Ryant Connelly2 tracked caseseryan@auer-ryan.com · (520) 705-7332
- Colleen M AuerAuer Ryan PLLCRepresents Ryant Connelly2 tracked casescauer@auer-ryan.com · (520) 705-7332
Counsel for defendants
- Younjin LeeConstangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLP - Los AngelesRepresents On Q Financial LLC3 tracked casesjlee@constangy.com · (949) 743-3924
- Xuan ZhouConstangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLP - Escondido CARepresents On Q Financial LLC3 tracked casesxzhou@fisherphillips.com · (858) 910-0493
- Brian Jay SchulmanWeiss Brown PLLCRepresents On Q Financial LLC4 tracked casesbrian.schulman@weissbrown.com · (480) 327-6650
- Allen SattlerConstangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLP - Laguna Hills, CARepresents On Q Financial LLC4 tracked casesasattler@constangy.com · (315) 430-4888
Other cases these firms appear in
- On Q Financial Class Action · Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group - Tampa, FL
- Fortra File Transfer Software Data Breach Settlement · Emerson Firm, PLLC
- MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Settlement · Emerson Firm, PLLC
- MOVEit Nuance Data Security Breach Settlement · Emerson Firm, PLLC
- PurFoods Data Breach Settlement · Emerson Firm, PLLC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Each eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.