Past settlements

Hampton v. Mattress Firm Deceptive Advertising Settlement

Mattress Firm allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts for mattresses on its website. The company denies any liability or wrongdoing, and the lawsuit has been settled without admitting the claims.

Paid Up to $40

Volkswagen Atlas Seat Latch Settlement

The settlement claims that certain model year 2018-2024 Volkswagen Atlas vehicles have a defect in the second row seat latching mechanism. Volkswagen denies the claims and maintains the mechanisms are not defective, but agreed to resolve the action through this settlement without admitting wrongdoing.

Paid Up to $1,700

Build Realty RICO and Fiduciary Duty Settlement

The plaintiffs contend that the defendants violated the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO Act) and breached fiduciary duties while engaging in a property-flipping business. The defendants deny all allegations. A settlement has been reached to resolve the dispute.

Paid $1,600–$20,000

Hubbard v. WCC Evergreen Healthcare - Wage Range Disclosure Settlement

Washington Care Center's job postings for open positions in Washington state failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range being offered, according to the plaintiff's lawsuit. Defendants dispute the claims and contend they have not violated any law.

Mazda Connect Infotainment Settlement

Mazda Connect Infotainment systems in certain Mazda vehicle models allegedly experienced technical glitches including reboots, freezing, non-responsiveness, bootloop processes, and audio/video errors. Mazda denies these allegations and denies the system is defective. The parties have agreed to settle the litigation without trial or court decision on the merits.

Paid Reimbursement for software updates and repair/replacement expenses for infotainment system components; automatic 24-month limited warranty extension

UCSD Health Data Breach Settlement

Unauthorized access to certain employee email accounts at UC San Diego Health was identified and disclosed to affected employees on or about September 9, 2021. The Regents of the University of California has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit over this data security incident.

Paid $33.94–$169.69

Collins v. Imagine360, LLC Data Breach Settlement

Imagine360, LLC, a vendor for employee health plans, experienced a data breach on or around January 30, 2023. Unauthorized access exposed private information including names, medical information, health insurance information, and Social Security numbers of individuals who obtained health insurance-related services through the company.

Paid $75–$5,000

Simmons BIPA Settlement

Motorola Solutions and Vigilant Solutions provided law enforcement with facial recognition technology called FaceSearch and access to a booking photo gallery. The lawsuit alleges they violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, using, and disclosing individuals' biometric data without complying with the law's requirements. Defendants deny wrongdoing.

Reventics Data Breach Settlement

Reventics, LLC experienced a data security incident on December 15, 2022, where a cybercriminal accessed and encrypted information on its network, potentially compromising personal health information and personal identifying information. The company notified affected individuals starting in February 2023. The defendants deny any wrongdoing, and no court has found that they violated any laws.

Paid $100–$5,000

Voivod v. Claire's Boutiques — Employment Application Settlement

Claire's Boutiques, Inc. posted job openings in Washington that did not disclose the wage scale, salary range, or a general description of benefits and compensation. The company disputes the claims and contends it violated no law, but has agreed to settle. Defendant has filed for bankruptcy and the case is currently stayed pending resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings.

Paid $690,719.82–$1.0M

Displate Deceptive Advertising Settlement

Displate allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on products on its website, Displate.com. The defendant denies liability and wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the lawsuit.

Paid Up to $18

Chandler v. The Regents of the University of California Settlement

The University of California allegedly authorized unauthorized strikes that led to canceled lectures, campus shutdowns, closure of food halls, and other disruptions affecting students' education and campus life at UC Santa Cruz during Fall 2019 and Winter 2020.

DraftKings NFT Settlement

DraftKings is paying $10 million to settle a class action lawsuit involving NFT transactions in DraftKings accounts. The page does not specify what the defendant allegedly did wrong or admit any wrongdoing.

Paid Individual payment amounts cannot be determined at this time and will depend on the number of valid claims submitted and the Net Settlement Fund after deductions for taxes, administrative costs, attorneys' fees, and Court-approved expenses.

Williams v. Family Dollar Stores - Coffee Settlement

Family Dollar Stores allegedly deceptively labeled, packaged, and marketed Chestnut Hill ground coffee products, overstating the amount of coffee in each package and the number of cups it could make according to the brewing instructions. Family Dollar denies any wrongdoing.

Paid Coffee Product Voucher

Lee Enterprises Data Privacy Settlement

Lee Enterprises disclosed subscribers' personally identifiable information (PII) to Facebook through tracking methods without consent, allegedly violating the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). The defendant denies the allegations and admits no wrongdoing, but has agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs and uncertainty.

Paid Up to $41.01

Hair Club Security Incident Settlement

A cyberattack on Hair Club for Men's computer systems occurred on or about October 17, 2023, in which a threat actor may have accessed files containing employees' personally identifiable and protected health information, including names, Social Security numbers, driver's license information, direct deposit account information, and medical information. Hair Club denies all claims and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and risks.

Black v. Smith Transport Data Breach Settlement

Smith Transport experienced a network disruption on or around February 12, 2022, that resulted in the potential disclosure of personally identifiable information of approximately 16,000 individuals, including names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and driver's license numbers. The defendant denies all liability but has agreed to settle the claims.

Paid $0–$5,000

Latch, Inc. Stockholder Settlement

Plaintiffs alleged that defendants engaged in conduct related to the acquisition and merger with Latch, Inc. (formerly TS Innovation Acquisitions, Inc.). The defendants have agreed to settle all claims for $29,750,000 in cash while admitting no wrongdoing.

Paid Individual payout amount depends on the Plan of Allocation based on the number of eligible shares held and the net settlement fund after deductions for administrative costs and attorneys' fees

AMI Expeditionary Healthcare Wage and Hour Settlement

AMI Expeditionary Healthcare allegedly violated California wage and hour laws by misclassifying certain healthcare workers—including nurses, respiratory therapists, EMTs, paramedics, and administrative staff—as independent contractors instead of employees. The settlement requires AMI to pay back wages and other relief to affected workers and penalties to California's Labor and Workforce Development Agency.

WellNow Urgent Care Data Security Settlement

On April 25, 2023, the defendants discovered that an unauthorized actor gained access to files containing personal information of approximately 597,000 individuals. The defendants published notice of the data breach in February 2024. The defendants deny any wrongdoing.

Paid Non-SSN members may claim lost-time and documented out-of-pocket expenses. SSN members receive pro rata cash payments from $1,100,000 fund (after deductions for administration and attorneys' fees), plus lost-time and documented out-of-pocket expense claims.

Johnson Financial Group Data Security Incident Settlement

Johnson Financial Group experienced a data security incident that compromised personal information of approximately 93,093 individuals. The company notified affected individuals of the breach and is paying to settle a class action lawsuit regarding the incident.

Paid $45–$5,000

Cornerstone National Insurance Data Breach Settlement

Cornerstone National Insurance Company experienced an unauthorized data disclosure discovered around November 29, 2021, where consumer personal information including names and driver's license numbers were accessed and disclosed without authorization. The unauthorized disclosure was announced in August 2022. Plaintiffs alleged Cornerstone failed to adequately protect consumer information, though Cornerstone denies wrongdoing.

Paid $25–$78

Hi-School Pharmacy Data Breach Settlement

Cybercriminals accessed Hi-School Pharmacy's systems during a November 2023 cyberattack, potentially compromising files containing individuals' private information. The defendant denies all claims and wrongdoing, and this settlement is not an admission of liability.

Paid Priority payment: (1) Documented Out-of-Pocket Losses, (2) Identity Theft Protection and Credit Monitoring, (3) Pro Rata Cash Payment

Wright v. HP Inc. Employment Wage Disclosure Settlement

HP Inc. and HP Health Solutions Inc. allegedly posted job openings in Washington without disclosing the wage scale or salary range for the positions. The defendants dispute these claims and contend they have not violated any law.

ImmunityBio Inc. Securities Litigation Settlement

Lead Plaintiff alleges that ImmunityBio, Inc. and its executives made false or misleading statements regarding the company's securities during the class period. The defendants have agreed to settle the litigation for $10,500,000 in cash without admitting wrongdoing.

Krud Kutter "Non-Toxic" and "Earth Friendly" Products Settlement

Rust-Oleum Corporation allegedly labeled Krud Kutter brand products as "Non-Toxic" and "Earth Friendly" when they may actually cause harm to humans, animals, and/or the environment. Settlement class members claim they paid a price premium for these products based on the false labels. The defendant denies the allegations and contends the products are safe, but agreed to settle to avoid the expense and risks of continued litigation.

Wheat Thins "100% Whole Grain" Labeling Settlement

Mondelez labeled Wheat Thins crackers as "100% WHOLE GRAIN," which plaintiffs claim was false and misleading. Consumers allegedly suffered harm from the false labeling. The defendant denies the allegations but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs.

Paid Cash Payments to Class Members (amount depends on number of approved claims; will be reduced pro rata if claims exceed available funds)

MERS Missouri Goodwill Industries Data Breach Settlement

In March 2023, MERS Missouri Goodwill Industries experienced a data breach that impacted the personal information of individuals. The lawsuit alleges harm from this data incident. MERS Goodwill denies all allegations and liability but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and risks.

Paid $50–$5,000

Navvis Data Breach Settlement

Unauthorized users allegedly gained access to Navvis' network between July 12-25, 2023, deployed ransomware, and obtained unauthorized access to files containing the private information of approximately 2.8 million individuals. Navvis and SSM deny any wrongdoing or liability.

Paid Pro Rata Cash Payments (estimated distribution April 5, 2028); Documented Out-of-Pocket Reimbursement (estimated distribution September 19, 2025); Documented Extraordinary Loss Reimbursement (estimated distribution September 19, 2025); plus IDX Credit Monitoring Services

Red Roof Inn Data Breach Settlement

In September 2023, Red Roof Inns suffered a data security incident that potentially exposed personal identifying information of customers. The lawsuit alleges that Red Roof failed to implement and maintain reasonable security measures to protect this information. Red Roof denies liability and wrongdoing.

Paid $0–$100

Litman v. State Auto Property and Casualty Company Depreciation Settlement

State Auto Property and Casualty Company allegedly improperly deducted Nonmaterial Depreciation when adjusting certain Structural Loss claims for Missouri homeowners. The company is paying to settle claims that it did not properly handle these deductions.

Smith, Gambrell & Russell Data Breach Settlement

Smith, Gambrell & Russell International LLP experienced a security incident that caused personal information of class members to be accessed, compromised, or impacted. The company is paying settlement benefits to affected individuals.

Paid Benefits depend on total approved claims; includes credit monitoring, CCPA payments, alternative cash payments, and compensation for lost time and documented out-of-pocket expenses

Concord Music Group Data Breach Settlement

Concord Music Group experienced a cybersecurity incident that occurred in or around February 2024, which resulted in individuals receiving notice of a data breach. Concord denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to this settlement to avoid the costs and risks of continuing the lawsuit.

Realogy TCPA Settlement

Coldwell Banker-affiliated real estate agents associated with Realogy Holdings Corp. allegedly violated the TCPA by calling people on the National Do Not Call Registry to solicit real estate business and by using prerecorded messages. Realogy denies any wrongdoing, and the court has not decided the case. A $20 million settlement has been proposed to resolve the lawsuit.

Paid Up to $281

Funko Securities Settlement

Funko, Inc. issued a registration statement and prospectus in connection with its November 1, 2017 initial public offering (IPO). Class members allege claims related to that IPO. Funko has agreed to pay $14.75 million to settle these claims without admitting any wrongdoing.

Paid The amount of individual payments cannot be determined at this time and depends on the number of valid claims and deductions for attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, notice and administration expenses, and taxes.

Saarloos v. Cowboy Channel Data Privacy Settlement

The Cowboy Channel, LLC allegedly disclosed subscribers' personally identifiable information to Meta Platforms, Google, and Yahoo without consent, in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). The defendant denies wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid the costs and uncertainties of continuing the case.

Paid Pro rata equal portion of the Settlement Fund

IL AG v United Builders Group Settlement

The Office of the Attorney General of Illinois brought a lawsuit against United Builders Group Co. and Polo Masonry Builders, alleging that these companies failed to properly pay their workers in accordance with Illinois law, including alleged failure to pay overtime wages. The companies have agreed to settle by paying owed wages and other compensation to affected workers.

Paid Owed wages and other compensation, less applicable tax withholdings. Amount varies based on findings of the Attorney General investigation.

Azura Data Breach Settlement

Between September 27 and October 9, 2023, an unauthorized third party gained access to personal information of Azura Vascular Care patients. The compromised data could include names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, medical records, and other sensitive patient and billing information. Azura agreed to pay $3.15 million to settle claims arising from this data breach.

Paid Up to $10,000

Cobell v. Salazar Indian Trust Settlement

The federal government mismanaged individual Indian land, funds, and other assets held in trust, including improperly accounting for Individual Indian Money (IIM) trust funds and mismanaging trust land. Courts determined the government violated its trust duties to over 17,000 IIM account holders.

Halo Data Settlement

In November 2023, HALO Branded Solutions, Inc. suffered a cyber-attack in which a third-party threat actor allegedly gained unauthorized access to HALO's systems and viewed and exfiltrated sensitive files that may have included personal identifiable information of certain HALO employees. The defendant denies liability, but agreed to settle the class action lawsuit to compromise between the parties.

Paid $75–$5,000

Plantronics Securities Litigation Settlement

Plantronics and several senior officers allegedly made false and misleading statements regarding the company's sales practices in violation of federal securities laws. Defendants deny the allegations and any wrongdoing. The settlement resolves claims brought by investors without admission of liability.

San Diego Fertility Center Pixel Settlement

San Diego Fertility Center Medical Group, Inc. and Ivy Fertility Services, LLC allegedly violated their Privacy Policies and the law by sharing personally identifiable device information of persons who visited their websites after January 1, 2020. The defendants deny these allegations and any assertion of wrongdoing.

Paid Pro rata cash payments distributed to valid claimants

UnitedHealth Group Optum Community Health Workers Settlement

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated allegedly sent prerecorded voice messages to wireless telephone numbers without the recipients' consent through the Optum Community Health Workers at Home program, violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The defendant denies the allegations and the court has not decided who is right.

The Edge NYC Ticket Fee Settlement

HY Attractions Manager LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a ticket processing fee for electronic tickets to The Edge NYC in violation of New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law. The defendant denies violating any law but agreed to settle to avoid the uncertainties and expenses of continuing the case.

Paid Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of fees paid

Sea Limited 2023 Securities Litigation

Sea Limited issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's Garena (digital entertainment) and Shoppe (e-commerce) business segments during the class period, in violation of federal securities laws. Defendants deny all claims and allegations, and the settlement does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing.

MiniMed Digital Platforms Data Disclosure Settlement

Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. and MiniMed Distribution Corp. allegedly disclosed or allowed certain information regarding the use of certain MiniMed digital platforms to be accessible to third parties. The defendants are settling this proposed class action without admitting wrongdoing.

Paid Pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund

Farmers Insurance Minnesota Class Action

Farmers Insurance and related entities allegedly improperly handled medical expense benefits in auto and business insurance policies sold in Minnesota, in violation of Minnesota's No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act. The defendants have agreed to settle the claims through this class action.

Museum of Sex Ticket Fee Settlement

The Museum of Sex and MoSex Exhibit 1 are accused of failing to properly disclose service charges for electronic tickets to their museum in New York City, allegedly violating New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law. The defendants deny wrongdoing but have agreed to settle to avoid the costs and uncertainties of continuing litigation. The museum charged a $4.00 service fee per ticket for online purchases.

Paid From $4

General Electric Securities Litigation Settlement

General Electric and executive Jeffrey S. Bornstein allegedly made materially false or misleading statements and omissions between February 29, 2016 and January 23, 2018 regarding GE's financial disclosures. The defendants allegedly concealed GE's reliance on intercompany factoring transactions to offset weaknesses in GE Power's cash flows, which artificially inflated GE common stock prices until corrective disclosures were made. Defendants deny all allegations and liability.

Plavan Data Breach Settlement

Plavan Commercial Fueling, Inc. suffered a ransomware incident on February 23, 2024, which exposed personal information of U.S. residents. The defendant notified potentially impacted individuals beginning in June 2024. The defendant has agreed to settle the class action lawsuit arising from this data breach.

Paid $0–$550

Botanic Tonics Feel Free Wellness Tonic Kratom Settlement

Botanic Tonics sold and marketed Feel Free Wellness Tonic containing kratom without adequately disclosing the harmful health impacts of consuming the beverage. The lawsuit alleged that kratom in the Feel Free tonics increased health risks for consumers. The defendants deny any wrongdoing.

Paid Pro rata payments based on the number of bottles of Feel Free purchased. You may claim up to 10 bottles without proof of purchase, and more than 10 with proof of purchase.

Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation Settlement

Defendants engaged in antitrust violations related to interest rate swaps. The defendants agreed to settle claims without admitting wrongdoing. This settlement includes multiple settlements, including one with Credit Suisse and a new settlement with other defendants.

Ford v. Farha Roofing TCPA Text Message Settlement

The defendants delivered non-emergency advertising and marketing text messages promoting Farha Roofing's business to cellular telephone numbers without prior express written consent, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The defendants also failed to disclose necessary information about the senders of those text messages. Defendants deny the allegations and deny violating the TCPA.

Paid $250–$500

Mena Regional Health System Data Incident Settlement

A targeted cyberattack on Mena Regional Health System's computer systems occurred on or about November 8, 2022, in which certain files containing private information were accessed. The compromised data included full names, dates of birth, social security numbers, driver's license/government ID numbers, financial account information, and detailed medical information. Mena denies all claims and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the costs and risks of continuing the litigation.

HP Misleading Discount Settlement

HP allegedly advertised misleading discounts for computers, laptops, mice, and keyboards sold on its website. HP denies any wrongdoing and the settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing.

Sutter Anesthesia Billing Lawsuit Settlement

Sutter Health allegedly engaged in fraudulent, unlawful, and unfair billing practices by submitting and receiving payment on bills for anesthesia services that were not rendered, were double-billed, or were misleadingly described. This caused self-funded payers to pay more for anesthesia services than they should have. Sutter Health denies all allegations and maintains that its practices complied with applicable laws.

Greylock McKinnon Data Security Settlement

Greylock McKinnon Associates discovered a data incident on or about May 30, 2023, where personal information of individuals may have been accessible. The affected information included names, Social Security numbers, Medicare Health Insurance Claim Numbers, medical information, and health insurance information. The lawsuit alleged negligence, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, invasion of privacy, and violations of California and New Jersey consumer privacy laws. The defendant admits no wrongdoing.

Paid $0–$10,000

GM Ignition Switch Economic Settlement (Canada)

General Motors recalled certain vehicles in 2014 involving the Delta ignition system, key rotation, Camaro knee-key, and electric power steering. Settlement class representatives claim consumers overpaid when they bought or leased these vehicles. GM denies these allegations but agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation costs and risk.

Paid Payment amounts will vary depending on which recalls apply to vehicles, administrative expenses, the number and type of eligible vehicles for which claims are filed, and the number of eligible class members who file claims

Medefil BIPA Settlement

Medefil allegedly violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by using biometric time clock systems that captured employees' and contractors' fingerprints and hand scans without first obtaining written consent. Medefil denies wrongdoing and is settling to avoid further litigation.

Paid Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund after deductions for attorneys' fees (30.75% of maximum), settlement administration expenses, class representative incentive award (up to $7,500), and expense award

MSCHF TCPA Settlement

MSCHF Product Studio Inc. allegedly sent marketing text messages to people who had requested to stop receiving them, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and Florida Telephone Solicitation Act (FTSA). The defendant denies the allegations and any wrongdoing.